Category: Uncategorized

By Sylene Argent, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Essex Free Press

After hearing a presentation from Tourism Windsor Essex Pelee Island (TWEPI) – the region’s tourism collaborative committed to enhancing the region’s economy and quality of life – at the May 5 meeting, Essex Council directed Administration to bring a report to Council considering adopting the proposed Municipal Accommodation Tax (MAT).

This report will be presented to Essex Council prior to August 31, 2025.

Scott Wilkins, TWEPI Board Member, approached Council, noting TWEPI hoped Essex would implement a MAT.

The proposed structure would be a County-wide initiative, with each municipality passing its own MAT by-law. The City of Windsor would be the collection agency. Funds collected in each municipality would stay in that municipality, minus administrative costs and TWEPI’s share.

TWEPI is currently making rounds to visit each of the seven municipal councils in Essex County.

A MAT “is a new revenue stream that does not come at a cost to your residents,” Gordon Orr, CEO of TWEPI, told Essex Council. He explained that back in 2017 the province enacted legislation granting municipalities the ability to implement a MAT.

The purpose of implementing a MAT is to directly benefit the municipality and to support local tourism growth and development, while providing municipalities with another revenue source to do so, Orr noted.

Benefits he pointed out include sustaining local tourism, economics, and revenue/seed funding for municipalities.

There are spending restrictions for the designated tourism entity and the municipal portion, Orr explained. Both parties must spend the collected funds to support tourism.

Orr said he introduced a County-wide initiative last May at a regional CAOs meeting.

He noted there are 73 municipalities across the province collecting a MAT currently. A year ago, there were 50.

He explained that at year end of 2024, the Town of Essex had 189 accommodation listings, including Short-Term Rentals (STRs) and hotels/motels. The average occupancy rate for those listings was 48%. The total estimated revenue for those was $4.9M.

When a MAT is applied to the total estimated revenue for the Town of Essex, it could generate $196,000 at 4% or $294,000 at 6%, Orr noted. That would be shared 50/50 between the Town and TWEPI.

In looking at all of Essex County with the total estimated revenue of $42M, a MAT at 4% would have generated $1.7M or $2.5M at 6%.

When TWEPI hosted meetings with local stakeholders last year, its reps heard some concerns, such as who would collect the funds and how to develop a MAT by-law.

TWEPI staff, Orr said, determined the City of Windsor would be the collection agency as a regional shared service, with the cost of the fulltime staff member taken off the top of the funds collected, shared 50/50. Once Windsor finds out how many municipalities in Essex County buy-in to the initiative, a meeting will be held to digest how much that will cost.

Windsor would also share its MAT by-law to assist County municipalities, which would have to pass their own by-law, deciding to apply the tax to hotels and short-term rentals, or just hotels.

Half of the funds collected through the MAT will remain in the individual municipality and not go to the County.

Orr explained the City of Windsor has collected a MAT since October 1, 2018. Funding for TWEPI has grown by 27% since 2019. The City increased its MAT rate from 4% to 6% on April 1. Orr was clear. The MAT program will not impact the funding TWEPI receives through the County of Essex. “It would be an additional revenue stream to both your municipality and for us at Tourism Windsor-Essex.”

Essex Free Press files noted that during 2025 Budget deliberations, TWEPI received $782,000 from the County of Essex as its annual contribution. It also receives funds from the City of Windsor.

Since 2018, Windsor has kept TWEPI’s base budget the same. This year, since the MAT is collecting more than the base budget, the base was eliminated, elevating that from the taxpayer. That would be the goal for the County, Orr said.

He asked Council to respond prior August 31, so it can plan a path forward.

In answering Councillor Rodney Hammond’s question on if the municipal share of the MAT could be used on by-law enforcement regarding tourism, Orr noted the funding is to support tourism and is up to the municipality to define that.

Councillor Joe Garon liked the idea of the MAT. Garon clarified with Orr that a municipality can do this on its own or partner with a tourism agency.

Councillor Kim Verbeek asked about municipalities choosing their own rate at either 4% or 6%, and how that could be a “logistical nightmare” across the County. Orr noted municipalities choose the rate, with the majority across the province having a 4% tax currently. If local municipalities choose different rates, it would be okay as the hotels or short-term rentals would apply them.

In answering Deputy Mayor Rob Shepley’s question on if there has been pushback from STR or hotel owners, Orr said there has not as the hotels in Windsor see the benefit.

Councillor Jason Matyi asked about opting-in and the possibility of opting-out if the Town decides it does not like participation in the program. Orr said it would be up to Council, but does not believe that it would come about.

Councillor Katie McGuire-Blais asked how the program could be monitored to ensure hotels and short-term rentals are implementing the tax. Toner explained there is software that gathers the number of listings, for instance. By-law enforcement could then look into what STRs should be bringing in.

McGuire-Blais would like the future report to look into that and how much effort or additional cost it will take to look into any issues that may arise.

Councillor Brad Allard also liked the idea. He suggested Essex look at a 5% MAT to be in a better position, as he said there are a lot of municipalities at four wanting to increase it.

In answering Hammond on possible retributions for hotels of STRs that do not charge the MAT, Orr noted that enforcement will be discussed. A MAT by-law could outline penalties.

In speaking of tourism statistics as part of the presentation, Jason Toner, VP Marketing & Communications, noted the organization hires firms annually to conduct a visitor economic impact report.

He said visitor volume in Windsor-Essex has increased since 2021. There were 5.6M visitors in 2023, compared to 4.4M in 2022 and 3.1M in 2021. Stats show visitors spending up 28% over $856M.

Of the visitors, 30% were international, with the majority coming from the US. Those visitors helped the local workforce by employing over 11,000 people, Toner noted.

In addition, the occupancy rate was just shy of 70%, with the average daily room rate $149.62.

By Sylene Argent, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Essex Free Press

Essex Council gave two readings to the revised edition of the Town’s Delegation of Authority By-Law at the May 5 meeting.

The updated By-Law was drafted by senior directors and the CAO.

The third and final reading will be presented for consideration at a future Council meeting.

The By-Law was updated to align with the Town’s new organizational review and legislative requirements that have come into play since the previous version was adopted.

It also addresses additional requests from administration, where administration believes they are doing things on a daily basis for which they need delegated authority, Joe Malandruccolo, Director of Legislative and Legal Services, explained to Council.

The Municipal Act requires Council to have a Delegation of Authority By-Law, Malandruccolo said, adding this piece of legislation allows Council to delegate its authority to other bodies to make decisions on Council’s behalf.

This process allows for the efficient use of resources, so work can happen when Council cannot come in to sit to make a decision.

Those additions include giving authority:

• to the Deputy CAO or designate to approve capital budget overages, so long as they are $10,000 or less;

• to the CAO or Treasurer to execute and submit grant applications for grants under $130,000 without Council approval where the project will be fully funded by the grant and aligns with Council’s strategic priorities;

• Development Services to release securities related to Site Plan Control Agreements, to approve Consent to Conservation Easement Agreements made by private owners only when required by the Committee of Adjustment, approve an application under Section 36 of the Planning Act to remove a holding provision when permitted under the Zoning By-Law, to approve applications to amend the Town’s Zoning By-Law site-specifically to prohibit the construction of a dwelling on a retained farm parcel resulting from a surplus severance only as a condition of the Committee of Adjustment, Consent Approval, and to approve renewals or extensions of wireless cell towers agreements that were already originally approved by Council;

• The CAO in consultation with the Mayor and Deputy Mayor to approve sponsorships or naming rights agreements with an aggregate amount of $130,000 or less, so long as it is in accordance with the Town’s Sponsorship and Naming Rights Policy, which Council would have to pass;

• Administration to deal with special occasion and event permits, as well as approvals and exemptions relating to them. That includes the Director of Community Services approving special event permits and requests, such as road closures, noise permit exemptions, authority and restrictions regarding the use of municipal properties without seeking Council specific approval for recurring events. Initial events would be brought to Council;

• Primary authority of sanitary and stormwater works to the Director of Infrastructure Services, so long as they are in accordance with the Town’s Consolidated Linear Infrastructure Environment Approvals;

• Primary authority to the Drainage Superintendent to appoint an individual engineer at a Council pre-appointed engineering corporation, and to approve assessment of apportionment agreements;

• Allowing the Clerk’s Department to issue Short Term Rental Licences, as long as the licence application complies with the Town’s Short Term Rental By-Law.

On May 1, the Strong Mayors Act was passed by the Province of Ontario, Malandruccolo noted. That means some of Council’s decision-making authority is passed to the mayor. Provided that the delegations and decisions made by the mayor through those powers are in compliance with the Municipal Act, they will override the Delegation of Authority By-Law and Council’s Authority, Malandruccolo explained.

Councillor Jason Matyi was not sure how much more delegation Essex Council wanted to do. In speaking to instances where staff can approve Short-Term Rental licenses, how will Council know how many have been added, though there is a moratorium in residential areas currently.

Council has to be accountable to constituents and be able to be in the know of such figures, Matyi pointed out. He had similar concerns with storm sewer works and budget overages.

“I have a lot of real concerns about the transparency of this and delegating all of this out, especially at a time right now when we are already being forced to delegate some of our powers,” Matyi said.

Malandruccolo noted that in some of the areas mentioned, an annual report will be required, so Council is updated on how administration is using those delegated authorities. He further suggested talking to the director responsible for the area for any other areas of concerns Matyi may have, and to come back with any recommendations prior to the next meeting.

In addressing Councillor Katie McGuire-Blais’s concern on budget overages, Director of Corporate Services, Kate Giurissevich, said the intent is to ensure administration is not wasting resources on preparing a report on something the Town may have to pay, anyway. It is meant for nominal amounts, but staff is happy to take feedback or look at a lower dollar amount threshold.

Malandruccolo explained that the Municipal Act requires municipalities to have a Delegation of Authority By-Law as it is understood there have to be some things that have to be done efficiently and can’t wait for a Council meeting.

He added some of the additions are legislated in order to assist with things like legislative authority.

Mayor Sherry Bondy said she is not one to delegate, but if Council delegates and has communication, it is a win-win. She was happy it was not being approved fully that evening, so Council could continue to ask questions.

With hearing concerns around the table, McGuire-Blais preferred to get the document to a point where Council was comfortable before giving a first and second reading. Malandruccolo intends to gather Council input after the meeting and not present the By-Law back to Council for third and final reading until he is sure at least the majority of Council would be happy with it.

By Sylene Argent, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Essex Free Press

Essex CAO Doug Sweet grew-up in Essex, raised his family in Essex, and has been proud to work for the Town for 16 of the 36-years he has committed to his career in municipal governance.

He is set to retire Friday, May 16, and while he is excited to spend more time with his four grandkids and family, he will miss the friendships he has formed over the years with colleagues, council members, and members of the community.

Sweet started his municipal career with the City of Windsor, right after graduating university through a co-op program. He started in its Parks and Rec and special events department. He said he loved the work.

He was able to transfer the wealth of knowledge he obtained working for the City to his hometown of Essex in 2004. He spent four-years here, before returning back to Windsor. 11-years ago, he returned to Essex to take on the Director of Community Services position. His role was eventually expanded to include Deputy CAO, before he was promoted to CAO in 2021.

The list of accomplishments of which Sweet is most proud is long. Being in the Community Services Department is unique in that “I can drive through the entire municipality and kind of see where I have had an impact.”

A few of the standouts was the development of the Colchester Park, which started with a gravel parking lot with no accessibility. It is now a great regional park, Sweet said.

Heritage Garden Park in Essex Centre is also a top project in which Sweet has helped to develop. It used to have the train tracks, and has become a hub with the pavilion, washroom, memorial Spitfire, with plans for an amphitheatre to come.

He was part of developing the twin pad arena in Essex Centre, and is proud to have had a hand in establishing the Maedel Community Centre, the developing Essex Sports Fields, and the Essex Municipal Building expansion taking place currently.

Sweet also points to simple things, like playground replacements. There used to be outdated equipment, and a plan was put in place to modernize.

He also reflects on some of the special events that have taken place over the years, such as the Canada 225 in Colchester, and hosting the Provincial Paralympic Games several years ago.

Before Sweet earned the CAO position, he noted there were four CAOs in five-years. His goal was to create some stability, which he believes has taken place. That has been great for Town staff, the community, and allowed the Town to work on a lot of roads and complete the Harrow and Essex Centre Streetscapes in the last few years.

“No matter what job you do, you have an impact; be it good or bad. And, hopefully, I have had a positive impact. I think I have in terms of even the CAO role,” Sweet said. He hopes he created a foundation upon which the next CAO can continue to build.

One of the most challenging aspects is the financial-side of running a municipality, Sweet said. People expect services, and the Town wants to provide those services. “But it is a challenge with the money you have.”

The term “you have to do more with less,” no longer applies. He would tell his staff “We have to do more differently.”

The group will now always think outside the box to see what can be done with the funding available.

Social media has also been a challenge, Sweet acknowledged. The expectations, and speed and response, in which residents want an answer is a challenge.

Sweet sees growth with the Town continuing, but it has to be controlled and reasonable. As people start moving out to the county more, he believes quality of life amenities will become more important to residents.

In terms of officially moving towards retirement, Sweet said he has known for a couple years what he wanted to plan.

“I love my job, I love the people I work with; that will be the one thing I miss, is definitely the people.”

During COVID, he said he wasn’t going to ask staff to come in to work, if he wasn’t willing himself, for instance. So, he did.

He loves talking with people.

Most of his career has been 24/7 on call, Sweet explained. He just wants to be able to enjoy his life and his family, especially his four grandkids.

He hasn’t ruled out possibly doing some consulting in the future, but definitely wants to spend at least the first year enjoying his retirement.

In addition to enjoying family time, Sweet said he plans to continue being active in sports and travel.

As someone who grew-up and raised a family in Essex, Sweet said it has been great to work in his own community and have a positive impact. “I’m pretty proud of that.”

One piece of advice Sweet would give to the incoming CAO, would be to ensure they maintain a healthy work-life balance.

“This role is incredibly demanding—truly a24/7 commitment—and it’s easy to get pulled in many directions with the expectations of Council, residents, and staff. It can be hard to disconnect, and over time, that takes a toll on both mental and physical health. While the job is very fulfilling, the constant pressure to respond quickly can sometimes overshadow the importance of personal well-being. That’s why I believe work-life balance is a critical piece of advice for anyone stepping into this role.”

He added his leadership style was to be collaborative and listen to people. Any decisions made were always in the best interest of the Town.

Several Essex Councillors expressed their gratitude to Sweet during his last Essex Council meeting on Monday evening.

“Doug’s leadership has been instrumental in preparing the Town for a successful future. His efforts have laid a strong foundation for continued growth and wellbeing for the community. I am truly grateful for all the hard work and commitment you did. Thank you, Doug, for everything you have done for Essex,” Councillor Jason Matyi said.

Deputy Mayor Rob Shepley added that Sweet’s steady guidance, dedication, and leadership have been invaluable to Council, the community, and to himself.

“Throughout my term, you have been a constant source of support, insight, and integrity,” Shepley added. “You helped navigate challenges, celebrated successes, and always kept the interest of Essex at the forefront.”

Sweet’s professionalism and genuine care for the municipality will leave a lasting legacy, Shepley commented.

Councillor Kim Verbeek spoke of how Sweet’s calm, kind mannerism helped her out on many issues.

Councillor Brad Allard called Sweet a mentor.

An emotional Mayor Sherry Bondy said she is not ready to let Sweet go, because she has been on Council for over a decade, and believes he is the best CAO the Town has ever had.

“Each time we had a CAO retire, I knocked on his door and asked him to consider applying,” Bondy said. “Doug, you have done an amazing job, not just in leading this Town, but in showing leadership in all your roles.

”The bar is set extremely high, Bondy added, noting Council and the community have come to expect a lot from the next CAO.

Sweet noted it was humbling to hear all of the kind words.

At his last Council meeting, Sweet said that moment brought reflection and immense gratitude.

“Essex has always been more than just my place to work, it is my home town. It is where I grew up, raised my family, and built a lifetime of memories. To be able to give back to this Town in such a meaningful way has been one of the greatest honours of my life.”

He thanked Essex’s residents for the privilege of allowing him to serve for them. “It has truly been an honour to help support and grow this vibrant, welcoming community we all call home.”

To past and present Councils, he extended his deepest gratitude. “Together, we faced challenges, we celebrated achievements, and always remained focused on the best interest of our community.”

To his staff members, Sweet noted they are the backbone of the municipality. “Your hard work, professionalism, and unwavering commitment day-in-and-day-out make a real difference in the lives of our residences.”

To the Corporate Leadership Team, Sweet noted what they have achieved together is a testament to what can happen when collaboration and a shared purpose lead the way. “I have learned so much from each of you, and I know you will continue to raise the bar.”

While accomplishments are significant, it will be the people he will remember and miss the most. “The friendships, the connections, the laughter, and a shared sense of purpose; these are the moments that made this journey truly special. I’ve been incredibly fortunate to work with such amazing people.”

He also acknowledged his family for their support and patience over the years, especially during those more demanding times.

“It has truly been an incredible journey,” an emotional Sweet said. “The Town of Essex has a bright future ahead and I can’t wait to watch it unfold.”

Sweet’s replacement has not yet been selected.

By Pam Wright, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Chatham Voice

The Municipality of Chatham-Kent has committed $50,000 towards fighting the expansion of the Dresden dump by York1.

Council made the unanimous decision at its April 28 meeting, following a presentation from administration outlining next steps in the battle against York1’s plan to accept construction waste from Toronto.

Council’s move comes in response to legislation put forward by the province in mid-April. Under Bill 5, the government plans to remove the Environmental Assessment it placed on the project last year, in the name of protecting Ontario from U.S. tariffs.

North Kent Coun. Rhonda Jubenville, who brought the motion forward, said she wants to make sure Chatham-Kent remains opposed to the dump expansion in principle, noting the property recently changed hands.

“We want to make sure the people of Dresden are protected and that the Municipality of Chatham-Kent is behind them,” Jubenville told The Voice.

The funding decision is the latest wrinkle in a 14-month battle that has seen the community of Dresden rise up to vehemently oppose the Irish School Road project, located only one kilometre north of town.

Chatham-Kent legal director Dave Taylor, and head of planning Ryan Jacques took to the podium to outline the municipality’s plan to oppose the development.

Taylor called Ontario’s bid to remove the full EA it placed on the proposal in June 2024 a significant “sea change” in direction, “reversing the win” the community thought it had received.

According to Taylor, Bill 5 legislation takes away environmental restraints on the dump expansion, “putting us even farther behind where we were before.”

Most significantly, said Taylor, is the concern that residents will not be heard at the same level they would have been under a full EA.

In his comments, Jacques explained that the site, commonly known as the Dresden Tile Yard, was mined for clay starting 120 years ago.  Clay tiles were produced there for 80 years.

According to Jacques, the site has two existing environmental compliance approvals from the province. One deals with the storage, transfer and processing of waste, currently limiting the site’s capacity to 75 tonnes a day and hours of operation from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday to Saturday.

Jacques said the existing approvals governed disposal of waste wood for a company that existed for many years, allowing for the disposal of non-hazardous waste. The other approval was granted in 1980, however, incinerator ash created by burning Dresden’s waste was landfilled at the site since 1967.

York1 has made two applications to the province, Jacques said, to increase the “waste storage, transfer and processing area” from 0.8 hectares (20 acres) to 25 hectares (61.8 acres.).

The company has applied to run the facility 24/7 and accept 6,000 tonnes of waste per day.

York1 is also looking to build a facility to process blue box materials and contaminated soil.

Council also heard three deputations on the matter. One was from Dresden Citizens Against Reckless Environmental Disposal (C.A.R.E.D) member Sarah Tanner and two came from members of a group known as Dresden Together. Other protestors attended the meeting as well, erupting in applause when various points were raised.

Citizens are advised to submit their concerns on the Environmental Registry of Ontario website. Submissions will be accepted until May 17.

By Pam Wright, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Chatham Voice

Another step has been taken towards developing a supportive housing complex at the Meadow Park site in Chatham.

At the April 28 meeting, council voted 12-5 to approve a recommendation from administration to proceed with a request for proposal for the redesign of the facility located at 110 Sandys St.

According to a staff report, the formers seniors residence will be used for both supportive and mixed affordable/attainable housing.

One deputation opposing the development was presented to council by Sheila Moir-Martin, who lives 600 metres from Meadow Park.

“Just because it’s easy doesn’t make it right,” Moir-Martin told council, pointing out the development is only 500 metres from both Ursuline College Chatham and the Chatham-Kent Women’s Centre.

She also raised concerns that the project would be run by Christian charity Indwell.

“Indwell does not always have the best reputation for providing safe, supportive housing,” Moir-Martin said, as she listed a number of crimes that have occurred at Indwell projects in Ontario.

“This is mainly due to the number of drug addicts living at Indwell,” she added.

However, the non-profit agency is known throughout the province for its comprehensive approach to supportive housing. Currently, Indwell is being actively courted by other municipalities – including Sarnia-Lambton – to come in and partner on supportive housing projects.

In his comments, South Kent Coun. Ryan Doyle said that while he supports supportive housing, he was not in favour of doing it at Meadow Park, stating that putting it close to a school and the women’s shelter is “not a great idea.”

In supporting the Meadow Park proposal, Chatham Coun. Brock McGregor said there’s a need to address homelessness and housing affordability in Chatham-Kent.

“I think we need to pay close attention to the assumptions we make of the people that live in any type of housing,” McGregor said. ‘It’s important to remember housing is a human right. We can’t define where people should live and we have a responsibility as a community to look out for the most vulnerable.”

Meadow Park was purchased by the municipality in 2024 as part of the municipality’s strategy to increase C-K’s housing supply. Staff have been working on developing supportive and affordable/attainable housing across Chatham-Kent with a focus on municipally owned properties.

Supportive housing can include offering specialized wrap-around services to individuals, the report said.

Other housing projects were also on the agenda.

A zoning amendment to allow a five-storey apartment complex at 85 Taylor Ave. to proceed was approved by council.

According to a staff report, the amendment was needed to accommodate the extra height up from the current zoning regulation that only allows for three storeys.

A handful of local citizens from the Chatham neighbourhood made deputations to council, voicing concerns the five-storey build would create a lack of privacy, compromising the ability of nearby residents to enjoy their pools and yards.

However, planner Robert Brown, representing owners Richard and Nicole Faubert, said the building is oriented east to west with no balconies and there are no windows facing north and south.

Brown said the design utilizes the property’s mature trees to help with privacy, adding the build will feature small units at market rent.

The proposal on the 1.4-acre property will see the demolition of a house followed by the construction of a 70-unit building, a storage building and parking.

Council also approved a request for proposal for a feasibility study and design of a supportive/mixed affordable housing complex at 416-421 Park St. E. in Chatham.

According to a staff report from Ray Harper, Chatham-Kent’s housing development director, the vacant property adjacent to Pet and Wildlife Rescue is “ideal” for both affordable and supportive housing builds.

Harper said two separate buildings are being considered for the site to deliver 80 mixed affordable/attainable units and 50 supportive housing units.

Currently, he said, administration is working to resolve environmental issues with the property to enable residential development.

A $5.7-million contract to build 11 affordable townhouses for families on Redwood Crescent and Eugenie Street in Chatham was approved by council.

The build will be able to house families as it will offer three- and four-bedroom units, with six townhouses located on Redwood and five on Eugenie.

Leamington based Barrineti Construction was selected for the project.

Harper said construction should begin in four to six weeks.

By Pam Wright, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Chatham Voice

A zoning application by an Ontario numbered company that would pave the way for Dresden’s Park Street Place to become an apartment building has been deferred.

Chatham-Kent council made the move following a presentation to at the April 28 meeting.

If approved, the move would see the former seniors’ residence transformed into market rent living spaces.

North Kent Coun. Jamie McGrail said she made the motion to postpone to allow for public consultation on the matter.

“My intent is to engage our community and neighbours and make sure the process is right,” McGrail told council, ensuring the Dresden community has the “opportunity to feel heard.

“I believe there is a disconnect between neighbours and the company,” she added. “We need to take time to review this.”

The land where Park Street Place is located is currently zoned institutional. A zoning change to medium density residential is needed to facilitate a private developer’s plan to create 40 apartments at 650 Park St. According to the plan, small units will be consolidated to make way for bigger apartments.

Park Street Place was utilized as a nursing home for many years, but was sold in 2024 following financial mismanagement and serious issues with patient care. The building was vacant until the Municipality of Chatham-Kent leased it to house residents displaced by the 99 McNaughton Avenue fire.

A handful of deputations on the matter were presented to council outlining concerns from neighbours.

Shannon Sherman told council that surrounding neighbours want the facility to remain institutional, noting the community needs another old age home.

Plus, Sherman said, residents are worried the project will lead to lower property values and to an increase in nuisance crimes, similar to what happened when the 99 McNaughton residents moved in.

Katie McLaughlin, who lives across the street from Park Street Place, said problems arose when the displaced moved in.

Fights in the gazebo, dogs running loose and cars being broken into were some of the issues the neighbourhood dealt with, McLaughlin said.

“We’d like to see it go back to a retirement home. We have an aging town and people want their family to stay in town so they can visit,” she said.

Concerns that the structure would be used for subsidized housing were also discussed, following a question by Chatham Coun. Michael Bondy.

David French of Storey Samways Planning Ltd. spoke on behalf of the numbered company. He said there have been “no discussions to date” that the structure would be used for anything other than market rent apartments.

“The rents are based on market level at an attainable level,” French said.

Officials are still working on the details of the public consultation.

The matter will return to council at a future meeting.

By Sylene Argent, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Essex Free Press

At the April 22 meeting, Essex Council postponed further discussion on possibly increasing the speed limit on the 4th Concession, from County Road 11 to County Road 23, and the 3rd Concession, from County Road 11 (Queen Street) to 100-meters west of Drummond Road, from 60km/h to 80km/hr.

This will give Town of Essex administration an opportunity to report back with more information to address concerns Council outlined during the meeting, and Council the opportunity to conduct public consultation.

The matter was first discussed back in December, when Council was presented with the 2024 Annual Speed Monitoring Program summary.

The summary outlined that data was collected between May 1 and October 31 at various locations throughout the municipality, collected by three different devices, including the discrete black cat unit, a digital radar sign, and speed trailer.

At the time, Council voted to receive the report and directed administration to report back with recommendations for appropriate speeds on Concession Road 4 and Concession Road 3.

The report outlined the observed 85th percentile speed – the speed at which 85% of drivers are observed to travel at under free flowing conditions – was above the current posted speed limit of 60km/h on each road on these two sections of road.

Data showed the average 85th percentile speed at these two locations was 82km/h.

Erica Tilley, Assistant Manager of Capital Works & Asset Management, explained the speed on Concession Road 4 was previously posted at 80km/h, but the Council of the day reduced the speed limit to 60km/h to address concerns with wildlife crossings and sightings.

Essex Free Press files notes discussion on the speed of the 4th began at the July 13, 2015 Council meeting, when a petition containing the signatures of 23 residents on the 4thconcession was presented. An overwhelming majority of those residents wanted the speed limit on their road reduced to 60 km/h from the McCormick Sideroad to the Arner Townline.

A motion to reduce the speed limit there was passed at that time, with the by-law passed later on.

Through the 2024 Speed Monitoring Program, Administration has obtained objective data that would indicate that motorists observe a safe driving speed of 80km/h based on the conditions of the road,” Tilley noted in her report.

Though history on the 3rd Concession speed limit reduction was not found, records indicate the speed was set to 60km/h prior to the 1999 amalgamation. The same justification for an increased speed limit can be used for this road segment, the report adds.

Based on the data collected, Town administration recommended the speed be increased in the two locations to 80km/h, Tilley noted.

Councillor Rodney Hammond wanted more studies to be conducted around the McCormick Road intersection to determine what cars are moving north and south, and are not getting counted going east and west in the area studied.

He was not in favour of increasing or decreasing speeds, until more in-depth study, particularly on the 3rd and 4th and around McCormick. He made that a motion.

The 85th percentile, Councillor Jason Matyi said, is one way to judge speed. Town staff members have pointed out people drive at a speed they feel comfortable. He believes the report missed the point in that there is a discrepancy between the 4th and 3rd Concession, as there are more cars going down one faster than the other.

At first, Matyi was in favour of bringing the speed back up to 80km/h.

He spoke of how when getting closer to Harrow, it does not make sense to raise it.

The speeds on the roads have to have aligned.Matyi would be more supportive to have the entirety of the 3rd and 4th concession be posted at 70km/h, with perhaps McCormick to Drummond reduced to 60km/h as Harrow is approached.

Councillor Joe Garon noted the data presented on the roads did not take accidents, fatalities, and number of speeding tickets on an annual basis into consideration.

If the speed is raised to 80km/h, Garon supposes some will drive 90-100km/h.

With the report issued, Deputy Mayor Rob Shepley said he was called by many on the 4th, who reminded him there are a lot of deer and wildlife in the area. He assumed the 3rd would be similar. That did change his perspective.

He wanted to see a plan that works for the design of the road, wildlife, and pedestrians, and would like a more wholesome look at the matter.

Councillor Brad Allard also had concerns with raising the speed, based on just using the 85th percentile.

Councillor Katie McGuire-Blais wanted to support Hammond in creating a more in-depth study. She did not want to put the matter on hold. In the end, she believed the speed will be changed to 80, but wanted to have all questions answered residents are reaching out to Council with.

Director of Infrastructure, Kevin Girard, noted when administration screened roads it was based on Town policy, which incorporates the 85th percentile, density of driveways, intersections, stop controls, pedestrians.

Administration concluded it never would have recommended the change from 80km-60km on the 4th.

He warned that if Council wanted a more in-depth report, it likely would not look much different than what was presented. If a more in-depth look was desired, he recommended looking to a traffic consultant, which would require funds.

Mayor Sherry Bondy noted that if Council believes a traffic consultant is needed, that would have to be discussed at budget time. This has been an ongoing issue for years, and she wants it done properly. The two roads need to be the same in speed.

Residents who have concerns with speeding and would like data collected can report them by contacting the OPP non-emergency number or by emailing psb@essex.ca which goes to the Police Services Board, and it can be considered.

By Sylene Argent, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Essex Free Press

Back in December, Council directed Administration to present a report detailing a review of the Richmond Drain to identify blockages that would hinder the flow of stormwater, identify any trouble spots that impede the flow of stormwater, and outline potential consequences attributed to intensification in and around the Harrow Centre.

The report was also meant to identify and report on potential actions the Town could take to improve the Richmond Drain and the costs associated with them.

Members of Essex Council were presented the completed report at the April 22 meeting, where it received the report and put in motion a plan to host a drainage open house.

Councillor Jason Matyi made the motion after Council discussion, where many voiced concerns that any request for improvements need to come from the residents, who will foot the bill on any work completed.

In a recorded vote, Councillor Rodney Hammond was opposed.

This drain runs from County Road 20 to its eventual outlet into the Cedar Creek, south of the 4th Concession Road.

The Richmond Drain is predominantly located on private property, Lindsay Dean, Drainage Superintendent, explained. It is around 11kms in length. It has a large watershed, and outlets into Cedar Creek that does eventually carry into Kingsville.

It is estimated Richmond Drain was designed for a one-in-two-year storm event.

A modeling exercise of the storm system was completed in 2021-2022. Any future developments will be subject to stormwater management and restricted release rates so as to not cause further strain.

The flood event in 2023 was recognized as one that was over a one-in-one-hundred-year storm. Dean said the Richmond Drain system did surcharge. It did handle the water, but took a few days.

In terms of condition, the Richmond Drain is heavily vegetated, Dean said.

Three options Dean noted Council could consider to make improvements included appointing an engineering firm to complete a Master Drainage Study, appointing an engineer under Section 76 of the Drainage Act to provide an updated maintenance schedule on the Richmond Drain, or appointing an engineer under Section 78 of the Drainage Act to review and make improvements to the Richmond Drain.

The third option to review and make improvements to the Richmond Drain had advantages in that the Drainage Engineer would conduct all consultations, the Town would get an updated maintenance schedule, and residents would have the opportunity to debenture the cost over five or ten- year terms, Dean explained. There will be a significant dollar value for the engineer cost. This is likely the most feasible.

If Council wanted to proceed, the Drainage Department recommended the third option, however, Dean noted Council does not have to proceed with anything at this time. Typically, these projects are initiated by someone in the watershed.

Mayor Sherry Bondy sees this as a file the next Term of Council should pick-up in the first year. She admitted that was a political decision.

“No amount of drainage infrastructure we would have had could have prevented the storm from 2023,” Bondy said. She suggested hosting drainage open houses in catchment areas.

Councillor Kim Verbeek agreed that the third option was likely the best, but did not believe Council should inflict that upon the residents. It should be up to them to bring it forward, noting it will come with a large cost. Council needs to be clear on how the cost would impact those residents.

Councillor Jason Matyi agreed. He also noted Council does not have to worry about saying “no,” as residents can bring it forward at any time if they believe it is needed.

Councillor Katie McGuire-Blais cautioned the action of postponing movement on the matter. If another large storm were to happen, residents may complain of flooding and point out Council did not act when it had the opportunity.

Deputy Mayor Rob Shepley believed Council should push the information out to the community and have them bring it forward.

By Pam Wright, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Chatham Voice

Chatham-Kent Mayor Darrin Canniff says the municipality will do everything in its power to fight the expansion of the Dresden dump.

“We need to come together as a community to fight this,” a disgruntled Canniff told The Voice. “Myself, council and municipal staff are going to do everything we can.”

Canniff comments come on the heels of the Ford government’s announcement it has tabled legislation to remove the environmental assessment (EA) requirement put on the project by the Ministry of the Environment last year.

“We’re in shock and anger right now,” Canniff said. “What rights do we have as a municipality?”

As part of a proposal by York1 Environmental Solutions, Dresden’s dormant landfill will be expanded to accept construction waste from the GTA. The operation, located only a kilometre away from the community, is slated to run 24/7, with an estimated 700 trucks travelling to the site each day.

According to the province, the EA needs to be removed because of the tariff threats posed by U.S. President Donald Trump. About 40 per cent of Ontario’s garbage goes to the U.S., so the province said it has to protect Ontario by increasing landfill capacity.

News of the project, which surfaced by chance early in 2024, sparked vigorous opposition. Led by grassroots advocacy group Dresden Citizens Against Reckless Environmental Disposal (C.A.R.E.D.) the community pushed back, helping bring about the EA requirement.

North Kent Coun. Rhonda Jubenville also voiced her displeasure, calling the move “environmentally irresponsible” and “shady.”

“I think it is horrendous,” she said, adding the Ford government is using Trump’s tariff threats as a “guise” to push the project through.

“To me it’s picking on small-town, rural Ontario,” Jubenville said.

Leaders in nearby communities also expressed their dismay.

Alan Broad, mayor of neighbouring Dawn-Euphemia Township, said in an email he’s “very frustrated.

“They promise one thing, then change it up,” Broad stated. “Seems like the tariff excuse for the government decision is replacing the COVID excuses.”

Lambton County warden Kevin Marriott echoed Broad, calling the province’s decision “extremely disappointing.

“We will be discussing it and I’ll see if we can get it on the agenda for the May 7 (Lambton) council meeting,” he said.

Canniff said next steps for the municipality include holding a public meeting in Dresden so residents can find out what they can do to help.

The municipality has also engaged law firm Garrod Pickfield, specialists in environment, municipal and planning law.

Those who want to officially oppose the government’s action are invited to submit their concerns to the Environmental Registry of Ontario at ero.ontario.ca/notice/025-0389.

Submissions will be accepted until May 17.

 

 

By Pam Wright, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Chatham Voice

In a show of solidarity with Dresden, Environmental Defence Canada denounced the Ontario government’s decision to fast track the York1 landfill project on Irish School Road.

The advocacy group released a statement April 22, condemning the Ford government for attempting to remove the environmental assessment it put on the property last year, saying that passing Bill 5 will cause “devastating impacts” to the Sydenham River’s species-rich waterway.

“Moving forward with this bill would pollute sensitive waterways and make it easier than ever to destroy and displace Ontario’s species – which is short-sighted and ultimately bad policy,” the statement read.

The proposed dump site is adjacent to Molly’s Creek, which flows directly into the Sydenham River. Well-documented as a biological hotspot, the river is home to at least 33 species at risk and if the dump is built, toxins could leach into the water.

“By removing the environmental assessment requirements, Premier Ford is revealing his government’s ‘pave-it-over’ approach that prioritizes harmful infrastructure projects over environmental protection,” the statement read. “Premier Ford is giving Ontarians the false impression that we must choose between the economy and the environment – but in reality, Ontario’s economy, health and sovereignty is directly linked to a thriving, healthy environment.”

In response to questions about the legislation, newly re-elected Lambton-Kent-Middlesex Conservative MPP Steve Pinsonneault said the decision does not sit well with him.

“I understand that our community is upset and am myself disappointed in this decision,” he said.

But in a statement also released April 22, Pinsonneault said in order to “stand up for Lambton-Kent-Middlesex and our province, we must ensure we have the tools and resources to respond to any unpredictable decisions from the Trump administration.”

He added he will work with the Minister of the Environment to “make sure every concern is being acknowledged, and discussions are underway.”

Before he was elected MPP, Pinsonneault spoke against the York1 project when he was a Chatham-Kent councillor representing East Kent.